Lusk Operating Co. v. Gelardin

Memorandum Per Curiam.

As between Horta and Gelardin, tenant and subtenant, there was, it appears, a formal technical *820reservation of a reversion in the sublease sufficient to endow it with the character which the parties signified in entitling it “ Sublease (Stewart v. Long Island R. R. Co., 102 N. Y. 601; Post v. Kearney, 2 N. Y. 394.) The Lusk Operating Company, Inc., the owner-landlord, in whose main lease to-Horta it was provided that “ The tenant * * * will not assign this lease or. underlet the leased premises, or any part thereof, without landlord’s written agreement ” was entitled to…