Legal Opinion

Branch v. Lapushansky

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 2003No. 01 CA 143PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeGenaro, Judge.

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court and the parties’ briefs. Plaintiffs-appellants, Travis Branch and Pami Patrick, appeal the judgment of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment for defendant-appellee, Grange Mutual Casualty Company. We are asked to decide whether Travis’s father, Stephen Branch (“Branch”), validly rejected uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, and, if not, whether appellants are entitled to double recovery under the terms of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Russell v. Interim Personnel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (4-20-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Peters v. Tipton, 07 Ha 3 (3-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API