Legal Opinion

Peregrine Financials & Securities v. Hakakha

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 2003No. 1-02-1626PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn

This appeal stems from an arbitration clause contained in an agreement entered into between plaintiff Peregrine Financials and Securities (Peregrine) and defendant Faramarz Hakakha. After a dispute arose between the parties, Peregrine filed a suit in the circuit court of Cook County seeking money damages. Hakakha filed a motion to dismiss based on a mandatory arbitration clause in the agreement. Peregrine subsequently sought arbitration with the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and filed a motion to compel arbitration with the circuit court, which was granted in October 2001.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And Patrick Palella v. Peter H. Lauer and Therese A. LauerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Federal Signal Corp. v. SLC Technologies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Aste v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Chicago Southshore & South Bend Railroad v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Vassilkovska v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Board of Education of Dolton School District 149 v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Board of Managers of Chestnut Hills Condominium Ass'n v. Pasquinelli, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Doe v. Department of Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. QuickClick Loans, LLC v. RussellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API