Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Harvard v. Harrington

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

May a foreign corporation that has not complied with the provisions of sec. 226.02, Stats., make a loan outside of this state, and payable to it outside the state, to a resident of the state, and validly secure the same by a mortgage on property of the borrower located within the state? The answer to the question depends upon the meaning of sec. 226.02 as it now stands. The section has been amended several times and a number of cases bearing on the construction given it previous to the amendment of 1915 have been cited to us by both appellant and respondent. Inasmuch as we place our decision…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Muldowney v. McCoy Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Union Trust Co. of Maryland v. RodemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc. v. Terminal Warehouse Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. Eaton v. HirstWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Bradt v. Beloit Dairy Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API