Legal Opinion
Irvin v. Woodliff
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 24, 1971No. 46380PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
We have for consideration here first whether or not the State has consented to be sued in this instance. It is well settled that a suit cannot be maintained against the State or any of its agencies without its consent. Printup v. Cherokee R. Co., 45 Ga. 365; Cannon v. Montgomery, 184 Ga. 588 (192 SE 206); Roberts v. Barwick, 187 Ga. 691 (1 SE2d 713); s. c., 192 Ga. 783 (16 SE2d 867); Peters v. Boggs, 217 Ga. 471 (123 SE2d 258); National Distributing Co. v. Oxford, 103 Ga. App. 72 (118 SE2d 274); Crowder v. Dept. of State Parks, 123 Ga. App. 793 (182 SE2d 512); Musgrove v. Ga. R. & Bkg. Co.,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roberts v. BarwickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Cannon v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Doe ex dem. Truluck v. PeeplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
- Stuckey v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Mack v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Board of Education v. DrurySupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Zurich Insurance Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Live Oak Consulting, Inc. v. Department of Community HealthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Department of Corrections v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.