Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Beason

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 24, 1991No. 65194PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This appeal arises from proceedings involving the estates of Macy Virgil Beason and Caroline Hearting Beason which were consolidated with a quiet title action. The trial court quieted title to the disputed land in favor of Albert and Eunice North, set aside a deed, and determined that a codicil to Caroline Hearting Beason’s will would not be admitted to probate.

In order to understand the issues, it is necessary to give background information and the procedural history of what has occurred in the case. Readers are informed that this dispute…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson Trak Group, Inc. Ex Rel. Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Mid States Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Maxine G. EverettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. Berry v. Estate of BerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Goetz v. Board of Trustees, Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Adamson v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Bank of Kansas v. DavisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. State v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. Snyder v. American Kennel ClubDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API