Legal Opinion

Crossman Co. v. Rauch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The insured secured a policy of life insurance from the Travelers Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn. At the time of the issuance of the policy, an agreement was entered into between the insurance company and the insured which is in part as follows: “ It is agreed that The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Connecticut, shall receive such proceeds of the above contract as the Beneficiary hereinabove named shall become entitled to, if not less than One Thousand Dollars, and in consideration thereof shall pay at the Home Office of the Company at Hartford, Connecticut, to the said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brearley School, Ltd. v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Judis v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. In re the Estate of HavemeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Holowaty ex rel. Cherka v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API