Legal Opinion

Schutt v. Arkansas Rice Growers' Agricultural Credit Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

This case was tried before the court sitting-' as a jury upon an agreed statement of facts and an agreement that A. H. Hemme would testify to certain things. The court found for the defendant and entered judgment in accordance with the verdict, from which the plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal.

It may be said that the statements which it is admitted that Hemme would make were not disputed by any witness, so that there was no dispute as to any of the facts in the case, which, as reflected by the record, are as follows: Schutt, the appellant, borrowed $200 from the appellee corporation on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamburg Bank v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. First National Bank of Monette v. First National Bank of LepantoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Hobart v. MontoneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Scroggins Farms Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API