Legal Opinion

Bermann v. Meth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1969No. Appeals, Nos. 177, 178 and 179PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This is a derivative action brought by the owner of one-third of the shares of the McCloy Company alleging that Harry Meth, the company’s president, received excessive salaries for the years 1960-67, inclusive.

Appellant, Meth, was a co-founder of the company which is engaged in the office furniture and supplies business and has been connected with it as an officer since 1915. Appellee’s father was also a co-founder, and upon his death on December 26, 1959, she inherited a one-third interest.

The lower court found as fact that between January 1, 1960, and December…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Black v. Parker Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Solimine v. HollanderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  3. Binz v. St. Louis Hide and Tallow CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Riddle v. Mary A. Riddle Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferber v. American Lamp Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Fields v. SaxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Krukemeier v. Krukemeier MacHine & Tool Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Miller v. Blatstein (In Re Main, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Ferber v. American Lamp Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API