Legal Opinion

Ward v. Dick

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 15, 1877PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action for Slander, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County, and tried to the jury before Beardsley, J. Verdict for the plaintiff and motion for a new trial by the defendant. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

This is an action for slander in imputing dishonesty to the plaintiff.

After proof of the speaking of the defamatory words had been made, the defendant, for the purpose of lessening the damages, offered evidence tending to prove that before the speaking the plaintiff’s reputation for honesty was below that of men in general; the court limited him to ten witnesses upon that point; the plaintiff had a verdict for $1,000, and .the defendant complains of the restriction.

The subject matter of the inquiry was the value of a reputation. To the law this is a tangible thing; it is property in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hope Mutual Life Insurance v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leverett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern Railroad v. AubuchonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Mogelberg v. CalhounWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Markham v. HerrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Latner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API