Legal Opinion

Hill v. Sheehan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and plaintiffs’ motion granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term abused its discretion in *913precluding plaintiff from. deposing her physician, who had moved to California and was not available to testify at trial. The record establishes that plaintiff was not aware that her doctor had relocated his office until her attorney was preparing the case for trial. CPLR 3117 (a) (4) authorizes any party to use the deposition of a medical doctor without the necessity of showing special circumstances. Plaintiff’s application to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beliavskaia v. PerkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Jones v. SherpaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Brandes v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Brandes v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Cohen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API