Legal Opinion

Dufford v. Nowakoski

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 29, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reargument of this cause being had and the court having carefully considered the matters urged and the authorities suggested in support thereof, we conclude that no proper reason for change or modification of the judgment of the court heretofore entered and reported in 125 N.J. Eq. 262, is presented.

It may be added that, the trust agreement remaining wholly executory, the parties settlor, being the only parties from or to whom any consideration moved, had the right at their pleasure to abandon the agreement and mutually release each other from its performance thereby putting an end to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crowell v. Hospital of Saint BarnabasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1876
  2. Dufford v. NowakoskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Accounting of Executors of KoretzkySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Camden Trust Co. v. HaldemanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. In re CohenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API