Legal Opinion
Baker v. Heaney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 22, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*578In a hybrid proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Patrick A. Heaney, the Supervisor of the Town of Southampton, dated September 15, 2003, which, after a hearing, among other things, determined that the petition for the incorporation of the proposed Village of Dunehampton was legally insufficient and an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the petition for incorporation was legally sufficient, the petitioners appeal, by permission, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Luria v. ConklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Elevitch v. ColelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re Incorporation of the Proposed Village of KaserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Incorporation of the Proposed VillageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Defreestville Area Neighborhoods Ass'n v. TazbirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Barnard v. St. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Berkowitz v. St. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Matter of Bernstein v. FeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- McNally v. FeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021