Legal Opinion

Anvil Gold Min. Co. v. Hoxie

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided May 31, 1902No. 520PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Suit to recover on attachment bail bond. The answer contains a plea in.bar in effect that the giving of the bail bond is an estoppel.

1Opinion of the Court

WICKER-SHAM, District Judge.

This is an action to recover upon an attachment bond given by the defendants, as *605sureties for one Carrie B. Lee, in a suit against the plaintiff in this action under the provisions of section 137 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act June-6, 1900, c. 786, 31 Stat. 354). Three several defenses are pleaded in the answer. The last of these defenses alleges that after the issuance of the writ of attachment on September 19th and on October nth the plaintiff in this action (the defendant in that action) filed an undertaking for the release of the attached property in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. WheelerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Drake v. SwortsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ferguson v. GlidewellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  4. Rachelman v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Fox v. MackenzieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. FishDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API