Legal Opinion

Hust v. Conn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1859PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Pulaski Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Hust was the plaintiff, and Corm the defendant. The record shows that the plaintiff, on the 28th of September, 1855, filed in the clerk’s office of said Court, a praecipe, in these words:

“ Jesse Com v. James Hust.
“ The clerk will issue a summons in the above entitled cause, returnable on the second day of the term. Indorse suit brought to recover damages for trespass—damages claimed, 200 dollars. [Signed] Carter and Hathaway, attorneys for plaintiff.”

*258A summons was accordingly issued, and delivered to the sheriff, which was on the same day, viz., the 28th of September, served on the defendant,…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bailey v. KainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Thames Loan & Trust Co. v. BevilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Leary v. EbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ClauseWyoming Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API