Legal Opinion

In re Mayor

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York comity. Application by the mayor, etc., of the city of New York to acquire property in New York city between Thirty-Third street and Thirty-Fourth street, alleged to be necessary to be taken for the improvement of the water front. From an order appointing commissioners, Edmund Coffin, Jr., and Smiten V. Tripp, landowners, appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

There is only one question which it is necessary to consider in the disposition of this appeal, and that is the recital in the order of the objection to the learned judge deciding the motion for the appointment of commissioners, because his right to do so had expired. It appears upon the face of the order that this application was made to the Honorable George L. Ingraham, a justice of the superior court of the city of New York, sitting as a justice of this court pursuant to statute, who, after the hearing and submission thereof, and before any decision had been rendered therein, had resigned…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frost v. ReinachNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Irving National Bank v. MoynihanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Irving National Bank v. MoynihanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API