Legal Opinion

Daily v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 15, 1871PublishedCited by 1 opinion

By this suit claimant seeks to obtain the sum of $350 from the United States, which, he claims to he due to him as commissions on amounts of internal-revenue stamps purchased by him in pursuance of act of June 30, 1864, sec. 161. There is, in this case, a preliminary question of jurisdiction to be considered.

Read the full summary

By this suit claimant seeks to obtain the sum of $350 from the United States, which, he claims to he due to him as commissions on amounts of internal-revenue stamps purchased by him in pursuance of act of June 30, 1864, sec. 161. There is, in this case, a preliminary question of jurisdiction to be considered. The claim suggested by the petition is founded upon a “ law of Congress,” and upon a ‘‘regulation of an Executive Department,” and upon “ a contract, express or implied, (statutory,) with the Government of the United States,” either of which vests jurisdiction in this court; and the…

1Opinion of the Court

Drake, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This action calls for the interpretation of the following clause of section 161 of the internal-revenue' act of June 30, 1864, (13 Stat. L., 223:)

“That any proprietor or proprietors of articles named in Schedule C who shall furnish his or their own die or design for stamps, to be used especially for his. or their own proprietary articles, shall be allowed the following commission, namely: On amounts purchased at one time, of not less than $50 nor more than $500, 5 per centum; on amounts over $500,10 per . centum.”

Among the articles enumerated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Portland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1869

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boughton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API