Legal Opinion

In re Certified Question from the Crownpoint Family Court

Navajo Nation Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2010No. SC-CV-50-07Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

The Court answers a certified question from the Crownpoint Family Court concerning conflicting provisions of the Children’s Code. The presiding judge requested a ruling as to how the following provisions of Children’s Code should be interpreted: 9 N.N.C. § 1055(C)(1) which states that “[j]urisdietion obtained by a Family Court over a child is retained until terminated by ... [t]he child becoming] an adult, except where a child becomes an adult during the pendency of proceedings in the Family Court” and 9 N.N.C. § 1156(H) which states that “[wjhen a child reaches 18 years of age all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Tso v. Navajo Housing AuthorityNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bizardi v. Navajo NationNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Young v. Tribal Grievance CommitteeSac and Fox Nation Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Goldtooth v. Naa Tsis' Aan Community School, Inc.Navajo Nation Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API