Legal Opinion
United States v. Schmidt
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 29, 2012No. 11-1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
Shana Schmidt was found guilty of assault with a deadly weapon and assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3) and (6). The district court 2 ordered Schmidt to pay restitution to South Dakota’s Medicaid program and South Dakota’s State Crime Vic tim Compensation program under the Mandatory Victim’s Restitution Act (MVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A. Schmidt appeals, arguing that the district court incorrectly determined that the MVRA applied and that the court failed to recognize its own discretion in deciding whether to award restitution.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Emaeyek EkanemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. SpeakmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Arthur Dale Senty-HaugenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Gary Allen ReichowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Clarence RiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Deuvontay CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Timothy Beston, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. KasperDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- United States v. WhitleyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.