State v. Chen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for impeding traffic, ORS 811.130,1 a Class D traffic violation. Defendant argued to the municipal court that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the offense, and he reasserts those arguments on appeal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
In an appeal from a judgment involving a violation, “the standard of review is the same as for an appeal from a judgment in a proceeding involving a misdemeanor or felony.” ORS 138.057(l)(a). When we review a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence following a conviction, we examine the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. TiffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. BainbridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. BolyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. JacobyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019