Legal Opinion

Shortel v. Young

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Burt county. Heard below before 'Waiceley, J. Thompson v. Loenig, 13 Neb., 387. Knowltonv. Hawes, 10 Neb., 535. Bump Fraudulent Conveyances, 200. State Bank v. Harrow, 26 Iowa, 426.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

Thié is a creditor’s bill, brought by the plaintiff against Edwina Young and Andrew Young, to subject certain real estate which, it is alleged, was conveyed to Edwina Young, but in fact belongs to Andrew Young. Cornelia Barnes is a mortgagee of the premises. The plaintiff alleges in her petition that, “at the May term, 1879, of the said district court, the said plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant, Andrew Young, for the sum of $1,183.17, the same being a deficiency on confirmation -of a sale of mortgaged premises, under a decree of fore■closure of a mortgage in favor of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. LoenigNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henrico County v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  2. Flynn v. BaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Zongker v. People's Union Mercantile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Callahan v. PowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API