Legal Opinion
United States v. Barr
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1969No. 68 Crim. 888PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendants are charged in separate counts of the indictment with violations of 18 U.S.C., section 242, 1 in that under color of state law, statute, regulation and custom they wilfully subjected and caused to be subjected inhabitants of the United States to the deprivation of their federal constitutional right not to be deprived of their property by the State of New York without due process of law. The hard core of the charge is that each defendant caused default judgments to be entered in state courts against specified inhabitants by signing affidavits of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Slaughter v. Legal Process & Courier ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- United States v. Nick SenakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Mullarkey v. BorglumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- George Velazquez v. Edward Thompson, as Administrative Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Carrasco v. KleinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.