Sease v. PaineWebber, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NESBITT, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Defendant PaineWebber, Incorporated’s (“Pai-neWebber”) Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action. The Court has considered the memoranda of counsel and the applicable law and being otherwise duly advised rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
By their complaint, Plaintiffs allege that Peter Butler (“Butler”), while employed as a security analyst at PaineWebber, purchased a substantial quantity of stock in Memory Metals, Inc. (“Memory Metals”), an over-the-counter stock. The complaint alleges that Butler together with Memory Metals…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Altshul Stern & Co., Inc. v. Mitsui Bussan Kaisha, Ltd. And Mitsui & Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kayne v. PaineWebber Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Federal Insurance v. MallardiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- AXA Equitable Life Insurance v. Infinity Financial Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Amodio v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Fillo v. DillonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1990