Legal Opinion

In re Geller

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 1, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peter P. Smith,

Official Eeferee. A paternal uncle seeks reimbursement from his infant nephew’s estate for burial expenses of the infant’s father. The father died without an estate and his sole survivor was his son, now fifteen years old. Insurance policies, benefits and other assets arising from the father’s death were paid solely to the son’s estate, which approximates $3,600. Prom no other source was the son’s estate created.

A proceeding to compel a guardian to pay for the maintenance and support of an infant is maintainable (Matter of Rivera, 175 Misc. 1039; Matter of Smith, N. Y. L. J.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re DorseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. In re the Estate of NevilleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of ConnollyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
  4. Rutecki v. LukaszewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. In re the Estate of KulykNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  2. Chrzan v. RuaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API