Legal Opinion

Phenix Ins. v. Gebhart

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the district court for Buffalo county. Tried below before Hamer, J. State Ins. Co. v. Sohreok, 27 Neb., 527; Am. Cent. Ins. Co. v. MoLanathan, 11 Kan., 533; Phcenie Ins. Co. v. Allen, 109 Inch, 273; Kau'.al v. Ins. Co., 31 Minn., 17.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This action was brought on two premium notes given for a policy of insurance. One of said notes was due October 1, 1884, and the other April 1,1885. The defendant in his answer to an action on the notes states, “that he admits the execution of the notes sued on in said action, but avers the truth to be that said notes were executed for and in consideration of a policy of insurance issued by said plaintiff to,this defendant; that said policy of insurance covered certain grain, hay, and stock; that said policy described said property as being situated on the following described premises,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Insurance v. SchreckNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance Co., of Hartford v. BrannonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Garbark v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Wagner v. National Fire Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. French v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Shivers v. Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API