Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Accountancy v. Rampell
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMES, Justice.
We review Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Accountancy v. Rampell, 589 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), to determine the validity of sections 473.323(1)(Z) and 473.317(1), Florida Statutes (1989). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(1) of the Florida Constitution.
Richard Rampell is a certified public accountant (CPA). When he called two businesses to offer his accounting services, a competing CPA firm filed a complaint against him with the Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Accountancy (Department). Rampell then filed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DEPT. OF PRO. REG. v. RampellSupreme Court of Florida · 1993