Clark v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Co.

GARY D. WITT, Judge.

This appeal involves a dispute over coverage on an automobile insurance policy. The insured driver argues that pursuant to policy language, the insurer did not effectively cancel the policy and hence that the coverage was in effect at the time of an automobile accident. The Circuit Court of Jackson County entered summary judgment in favor of the insurer. We reverse.

Factual and Procedural History

On September 10, 2004, Appellant Kenneth Clark (“Clark”) paid the premium of $181 for a contract for automobile insurance coverage with Progressive Preferred (“Progressive”) on a…