Legal Opinion

Aetna Insurance Co. v. Koganovsky

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 1995No. 95-3083PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner raises a number of grounds on which to grant a petition for certiorari, two of which require that we grant the relief requested, in part. The trial court failed to conduct an in camera hearing to determine if the materials being sought were protected by the attorney-client privilege. Accordingly, we quash its order and remand for in camera review to determine which documents are protected by the privilege. Old Stone Bank v. Farris, 647 So.2d 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), rev. denied, 659 So.2d 271 (Fla.1995).

Similarly, because of the absence of any hearing upon the question of work…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Turtle Reef Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Alachua General Hosp., Inc. v. Zimmer USA, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Old Stone Bank v. FarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Boca Raton Hotel & Club v. DunnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dismas Charities, Inc. v. DabbsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API