Bayer AG v. Schein Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1ConcurrenceRader, Circuit Judge
Because the alleged best mode in this case was an intermediate, not the claimed invention, the district court correctly concluded that the best mode requirement “does not compel disclosure of the unclaimed method.” Bayer AG, 129 F.Supp.2d at 721. On this basis, I would affirm. I write to underscore the district court’s correct application of the statutory test for best modes. The alleged best mode in this case does not fall within the scope of the claims. Therefore, this case simply does not require creation of a new test for best modes.
I
Title 35 requires disclosure of “the best mode…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hildreth v. MastorasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Dana Corporation v. Ipc Limited Partnership and International Packing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- National Recovery Technologies, Inc. v. Magnetic Separation Systems, Inc. And Garry R. KennyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Decca Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Wahl Instruments, Inc. And Robert Parker v. Acvious, Inc. And Kenneth J. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.