Legal Opinion

People v. Arriaga

Syracuse City Court

Decided February 25, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris Garber, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the information herein, upon the ground that subdivision 3 of section 484 of the Penal Law does not apply herein. In substance, the information alleges that on the 16th day of August, 1964, the defendant gave or procured to be given to two named girls, aged 14 and 15 years, beer and vodka, alcoholic beverages as defined by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, at 300 Gifford Street, in the City of Syracuse, New York, in violation of subdivision 3 of section 484 of the Penal Law.

It is conceded by both parties, as follows: that the defendant’s apartment is located at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. The People v. . McCannNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. In re the Trustees of the New York & Brooklyn BridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Bell v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Stambach v. PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Santoro v. Di MarcoNassau County District Court · 1971
  4. People v. HeilRye City Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API