Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garner v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 18, 2010No. 26, September Term, 2009Published

1Dissent

*391Dissenting Opinion by BELL, C.J., which HARRELL J. joins as to Part I.

This case presents two issues. First, whether the statement, “Can I get a 40?,” made by an unknown declarant in a call to the petitioner’s cell phone and intercepted by a police officer, is admissible as non-hearsay, to show that the petitioner was distributing cocaine. As to this issue, the majority holds that this statement is a verbal act, and, therefore, is not hearsay and is admissible. Garner v. State, 414 Md. 372, 388, 995 A.2d. 694, 703-04, 2010 WL 1957227 (2010). The second issue is whether, in compliance with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. State v. DullardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  5. Mosley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API