Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Maynard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 3, 2003No. 25747PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

The United States Supreme Court (USSC), in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), held the execution of a mentally retarded person is cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The USSC noted that “[t]o the extent there is serious disagreement about the execution of mentally retarded offenders, it is in determining which offenders are in fact retarded.... Not all people who claim to be mentally retarded will be so impaired as to fall within the range of mentally retarded offenders about whom there is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Singleton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. ReedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hall v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. StrodeTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Elmore v. OzmintCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API