Legal Opinion

Flores v. Point Pickup Technologies, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 26, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00193Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JEAN FLORES, on behalf of the Class and Case No. 1:22-cv-00193-JLT-SKO Class Members, 11 ORDER VACATING HEARING AND Plaintiff, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS v. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 13 POINT PICKUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., (Doc. 30) 14 Defendant. 15 _____________________________________/ 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 On April 9, 2024, Cary G. Palmer and Jimmy Macias of the law firm Jackson Lewis P.C. 18 (“Attorneys Palmer and Macias”), attorneys for Defendant Point Pickup Technologies, Inc. 19…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Eyak Native Village v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Highley v. RothmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. Logic Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Williford v. TooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API