Legal Opinion

Celotex Corp. v. Foytik

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 7, 1992No. 90-1112Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the final judgment. The testimony appellant claims should have been excluded was cumulative and any error in its admission was harmless. Butcher v. Miami Elevator Co., 568 So.2d 61, 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Metropolitan Dade County v. Coats, 559 So.2d 71, 73 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 569 So.2d 1279 (Fla.1990).

The remaining issue on appeal was not preserved for review. Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc., 417 So.2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 424 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1982); Lollie v. General Motors Corp., 407 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), review denied, 413 So.2d 876 (Fla.1982);…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dupuis v. 79th Street Hotel, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Lollie v. General Motors Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Metropolitan Dade County v. CoatsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Butcher v. Miami Elevator Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API