Legal Opinion

State v. . Nash

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

This was a Motion in the Supreme Court for a certiorari. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

The defendant, who did not appeal in forma pauperis, but has executed his appeal bond, refused to pay the costs of the transcript of the record on appeal. The Clerk thereupon declined to send itup. The application for certiorari therefore presents the question whether, in criminal actions, the Clerk can require the cost of the transcript to be paid in advance. It is settled that in civil cases he can. Andrews v Whisnant, 83 N. C., 446; Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. C., 127.

But in criminal actions it is otherwise. The Code, § 3758, provides, “ No officer shall be compelled to perform any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Andrews v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Martin v. . ChasteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Morris v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. . NevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. State v. . DeytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Caldwell v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Dunn v. . Clerk's OfficeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Speller v. . SpellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API