Means v. Means
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County
1Opinion of the Court
Acker, J.,
This matter is before this court on a motion for a rule to show cause why the provision of the Federal Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of October 17, 1940, sec. 888, 50 U. S. C. A. §501, 54 Stat. 1178, should apply to prevent this *229divorce action from going forward. Pursuant to section 200 of the said act, 50 U. S. C. A. §520(3), an attorney was appointed by this court to represent defendant.
At the time of the hearing, the complaint in divorce had not been served, but the sheriff had reported that, after a diligent search, defendant was not found.
Interrogatories were directed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fourth National Bank v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Runge v. FlemingDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
- Fluhr v. FluhrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Mayfair Sales, Incorporated v. SamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964