Legal Opinion · Dissent

Insurance Co. of North America v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1988Published

1Dissent

Hancock, Jr., J.

(dissenting). Under both General Municipal Law § 22 (2) and Administrative Code of the City of New York § C17-3, the City may assert a claim for real estate back taxes against the proceeds of a fire insurance policy, only where the policy "insurfes] the interest of an owner [emphasis added]” in the property. Because I believe that the insurance policy in question, issued to a court-appointed receiver, does not insure the interest of an "owner” within the meaning of the statutes, I would affirm and hold that Cohen, not the City, is entitled to the insurance proceeds.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Atlantic Trust Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Keeney v. . Home Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Riggs v. Commercial Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Stokes v. . Hoffman House of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. 149 Clinton Avenue North, Inc. v. GrassiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API