Legal Opinion
Di Lustro v. Penton
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 14, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Barns, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner is held by the respondent upon an information charging him as follows:
FIEST COUNT: * * * Did then and there unlawfully engage in the practice of barbering without first having obtained a certificate of registration as a registered barber issued pursuant to the provisions of of Chapter 14650 of the Laws of Florida of 1931 by the Bo'ard of Barber Examiners, said board established by said act.
SECOND COUNT: * * * Did then and there unlawfully hire and employ a certain person, to-wit: to engage in the practice of barbering, the said........not then and there…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State ex rel. Clarkson v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- State ex rel. Bonsteel v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. SimonSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Fulton v. IvesSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Corn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Lane Drug Stores, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Eslin v. CollinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Makos v. PrinceSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.