Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Eckerd's Cut Rate Medicine Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 10, 1933No. 4892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The two tooth paste patents Nos. 1,222,-144 and 1,225,362 here involved have been discussed at full length and in much detail by the comprehensive opinion ■ of the court below. (D. G.) 53 F.(2d) 215, 216. Having been given such full attention and discussion, as they can fairly ask for, and finding bur-selves in accord with the views of the court below, there is no warrant for this court enlarging the reeord by a further discussion, which would simply he an effort on our part to state in different words what the court below has sufficiently and accurately' so done!…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoover v. Eckerd's Cut Rate Medicine Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
  2. In re LangerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API