Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Cary

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided January 12, 2006No. 05-0403; Crim.App. No. S30146Published

1ConcurrenceCrawford, Judge

The plain error issue is not unique to military practice. The Rules for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) are modeled after the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and accordingly, we should follow the guidance provided by our superior court in applying or interpreting our rules. Specifically, we should apply Supreme Court precedent in determining whether we should correct an error not raised at trial. While I initially agreed with the “plain error” standard set forth in United States v. Powell, 49 M.J. 460 (C.A.A.F.1998), upon reflection, I have recognized my mistake and have since followed Supreme…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API