Legal Opinion

Atlantic Richfield Company v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1978No. 76-1882, 76-1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”) petitioned to review two orders of the Federal Power Commission (“FPC”) on the grounds that the FPC improperly set “new gas” ceiling prices on ARCO’s sales of natural gas to El Paso Natural Gas Company (“El Paso”). The FPC granted temporary certificates of public convenience and necessity enabling ARCO to make the sales to El Paso. Our jurisdiction rests on 15 U.S.C. § 717r(b).

The FPC ruled that the natural gas which ARCO contracted to sell in interstate commerce after January 1, 1973, was subject to the “old gas” price ceilings under FPC regulations,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. California v. Southland Royalty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Phillips Petroleum Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Colorado Interstate Gas Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API