Bank of Napoleonville v. Knobloch & Rainold
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Porter Parker, Judge. Suit by the Bank of Napoleonville against Knobloch & Rainold. Plaintiff’s demand rejected, and it appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLeche, J.
The Rosedale plantation, situated in the parish of Assumption, belonging at the time to the Rosedale Planting & Manufacturing Company, was, on the 3d day of Eebruary, 1912, seized under a writ of seizure and sale issued in the matter of Emil Sundberry v. Chauííe Bros., and was advertised to be sold at public auction on March 23, 1912. The crop of sugar cane grown on said plantation during the year 1911, as well as other sugar cane purchased during that year by the owners of the plantation, had been harvested and ground and most of the proceeds sold at the time the seizure was made, but there…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by26 opinions
- Snelling v. AdairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Howard L. Makofsky, Jr. v. Raymond C. Cunningham, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Rosenthal v. GauthierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Rutherford v. ImpsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Johnson v. Capital City Ford CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.