HRA, Inc. v. Tennessee Department of Commerce & Insurance
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TODD, Presiding Judge, Middle Section.
This appeal involves judicial review of an administrative decision regarding the proper premium charges to be paid by HRA, Inc. for its workers compensation insurance. The Trial Court determined that it was without jurisdiction because an interested party was not made a party to the petition for review. HRA has appealed and presented two issues as follows:
1. WHETHER THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN DISMISSING THE PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND FAILURE TO JOIN AN INDISPENSABLE PARTY WHEN THE “INDISPENSABLE PARTY”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tarnopol v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Cissell v. Colorado State Bd. of Assessment App.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- City and County of Denver v. DISTRICT COURT OF SECOND DISTRICTSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Hennigh v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Jaco v. Department of Health, Bureau of MedecaidTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- United Steelworkers of America v. Tennessee Air Pollution Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Northcott v. Dept. of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Schering Healthcare v. St. Bd. EqualizationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.