Legal Opinion

Plaxico v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 1944No. A-10282PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, P. J.

The defendant, Jack Plaxico, was charged by information filed in the district court of Comanche county with the crime of larceny of livestock; was tried, convicted and sentenced to serve three years in the State Penitentiary, and has appealed.

For a reversal of this case, it is contended that there is not sufficient evidence to corroborate the testimony of the accomplices and that, therefore, the evidence is wholly insufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction.

The theory of the prosecution was that the defendant had made an agreement with two youths, Ray Seay, age 17, and Ode Risinger,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Underwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Hathcoat v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Haas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Mills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Rowland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. McMurtry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Rushing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API