Legal Opinion
In the Interest of S.J.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 19, 1998No. 24 E.D.Appeal Docket 1996Published
1Opinion of the Court
713 A.2d 45 (1998)
In the Interest of S.J.
Appeal of S.J.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 16, 1996.
Decided May 19, 1998.
John W. Packel, Linda A. Peyton, Philadelphia, for S.J.
Catherine Marshall, Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Philadelphia, for the Com.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.
NIGRO, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court which affirmed the trial court's denial of Appellant's motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons which follow, we reverse.
In reviewing a suppression court's ruling, we are bound by those factual…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.