Legal Opinion

Switzer v. Switzer

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1984No. 54943PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Danny Hall Switzer has been found in violation of certain financial provisions of a property settlement agreement incorporated into a final decree of divorce entered by the Chancery Court of Rankin County, Mississippi, adjudged in contempt, and committed to the custody of the sheriff until he purge himself. He appeals to this Court, arguing that such an incorporated property settlement agreement is not enforceable by contempt proceedings and, in the alternative, that the agreement is too vaguely worded to support an adjudication of contempt. For the reasons set forth below, we reject…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tedford v. DempseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Marascalco v. MarascalcoMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Taylor v. TaylorMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Roberts v. RobertsMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Owen v. GerityMississippi Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Newell v. HintonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Clark v. MyrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. West v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Bell v. BellMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Clements v. YoungMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API