Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Terrell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1980No. 248PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to: 1) request instructions on the defense of self-defense; and 2) file a petition for reconsideration of sentence. We remand for reconsideration of sentence.

On September 11, 1975, a jury convicted appellant of voluntary manslaughter. The Supreme Court, holding that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jurors on involuntary manslaughter, reversed and remanded for a new trial. See Commonwealth v. Terrell, 482 Pa. 303, 393 A.2d 1117 (1978). On February 9,1979, a jury convicted appellant of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. PavillardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. CappielloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. RittleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API