Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 24, 2005No. A05A0289PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Melvin Delano Jackson was convicted by a jury of enticing a child for indecent purposes, aggravated child molestation, and statutory rape. His amended motion for new trial was denied, and Jackson appeals. Because the State did not present sufficient evidence of aggravated child molestation, that conviction must be reversed. For the reasons that follow, however, the trial court did not err in denying Jackson’s motion for new trial with respect to the remaining convictions.

1. We first address Jackson’s contentions that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mallory v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Segura v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Lengsfeld v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Jorge Alberto Miranda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API