The A. H. Jennings & Sons Tire & Accessory Co. v. Farmer

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This controversy involves the validity of proceedings and a judgment in aid of execution. Plaintiff prevailed and defendants appeal. The facts are substantially these:

During August and September, 1926, the defendant, William Farmer, purchased from plaintiff automobile accessories in the amount of $136.50. At that time Farmer owned real estate of the approximate value of $20,000 with $4,000 encumbrance. He was also operating a dairy business, the stock and equipment being unencumbered. In October, 1926, Farmer executed a deed to his wife,…