Legal Opinion

State v. Keller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2017No. CC 110342882; A148749; SC S064353PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

A Washington State Trooper had probable cause to believe that defendant was violating Washington traffic laws and initiated a stop in Washington; however, the trooper did not complete the stop until both he and defendant had travelled across the state line into Oregon. In a subsequent prosecution for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), defendant moved to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the trooper’s stop, arguing that the trooper had violated defendant’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Virginia v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alex Wayne Westra v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. State v. Leos-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. State v. Leos-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Alex Wayne Westra v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  5. Alex Wayne Westra v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API